Abortion policy in the United States has undergone dramatic changes since the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision (2022) overturned Roe v. Wade, returning abortion regulation to the states. The current landscape varies dramatically by state, from near-total bans to constitutional protections for abortion access.
Below are the major policy positions on this issue, arranged from one end of the spectrum to the other.
Based on belief that human life with full moral status begins at fertilization. Views abortion as morally equivalent to homicide regardless of circumstances.
Example: No U.S. state currently has a complete ban with zero exceptions, though some come close.
Prioritizes fetal life while acknowledging situations where continuing pregnancy would cause death. Often includes criminal penalties for providers.
Example: Texas (6-week ban), Idaho, South Dakota, and several other states have near-total bans.
Seeks to limit elective abortion while providing exceptions for difficult circumstances. Aligns with fetal developmental milestones like heartbeat detection.
Example: Georgia (6 weeks after heartbeat), Florida (6 weeks), Ohio (22 weeks after ballot measure).
Balances interests: pregnant person's autonomy before viability, state's interest in potential life after viability. Health exceptions preserve access when needed.
Example: Previous federal constitutional standard under Roe v. Wade (1973-2022).
Emphasizes bodily autonomy and trusts decisions to pregnant people and their doctors. Opposes restrictions seen as medically unnecessary or designed to limit access.
Example: Colorado, New Jersey, and Vermont have no gestational limits.
Argues that pregnant people have absolute bodily autonomy and any restriction is an imposition. Views abortion as healthcare that should be universally accessible.
Example: North Korea and China have historically had unrestricted policies, though context differs significantly.
How other nations approach this issue:
No federal abortion law since 1988 Supreme Court ruling struck down restrictions. Abortion available throughout pregnancy, regulated only as medical procedure. Publicly funded through healthcare system. Policies: No criminal abortion law; treated as healthcare Statistics: Abortion rate: ~10 per 1,000 women. Over 90% performed in first trimester despite no legal limit. Outcomes: Universal access in principle but geographic barriers exist. Most abortions still early in pregnancy despite lack of limits.
Technically illegal but not punished if performed within 12 weeks after mandatory counseling and 3-day waiting period. Later abortions allowed for medical reasons or serious fetal abnormalities. Policies: Unlawful but unpunished in first trimester with counseling; medical exemptions later Statistics: Abortion rate: ~5.5 per 1,000 women (declining). ~96% in first trimester. Outcomes: Low abortion rate with accessible services. Counseling requirement controversial but not eliminated.
One of most restrictive in Europe. Near-total ban since 2020 Constitutional Tribunal ruling eliminated fetal abnormality exception. Only permitted for rape/incest or life threat. Significant underground/cross-border access. Policies: Near-total ban; rape/incest and life exceptions only Statistics: Official abortions: ~200 per year legally. Estimated 80,000-150,000 Polish women obtain abortions abroad or illegally annually. Outcomes: Extremely low legal abortions but significant illegal/cross-border access. Major protests and political controversy.
Legal on request up to 14 weeks (extended from 12 in 2022). Later permitted for health reasons. Enshrined in constitution (2024). Publicly funded, widely accessible. Policies: On request to 14 weeks; health exceptions later; constitutional protection Statistics: Abortion rate: ~15 per 1,000 women. ~230,000 abortions annually. Outcomes: Stable abortion rate. Constitutional protection passed in response to U.S. Dobbs decision.
Dramatic shift from near-total ban to legalization in 2018 via referendum. Now permitted on request up to 12 weeks, later for health/fatal fetal conditions. Implemented with GP access. Policies: Legal to 12 weeks on request; health exceptions beyond Statistics: ~8,000 abortions annually since legalization (previously Irish women traveled to UK). Outcomes: Successful transition from highly restrictive to accessible. Reduced need for cross-border travel.
Varies by state but national decriminalization trend. Supreme Court ruled federal criminalization unconstitutional (2023). Mexico City legal since 2007. Many states liberalizing. Policies: Federal decriminalization; state-by-state access expanding Statistics: Significant variation by state. Mexico City: ~200,000 legal abortions since 2007. Outcomes: Trend toward liberalization contrasts with U.S. movement. Medical tourism from Texas to Mexico increasing post-Dobbs.
Complete ban including for rape, incest, and life of mother. Among strictest globally. Women imprisoned for pregnancy complications suspected of being abortions. Policies: Total ban, no exceptions; criminal penalties including decades-long prison sentences Statistics: Unknown underground abortion numbers. Documented cases of women imprisoned for miscarriages/stillbirths. Outcomes: Severe consequences including maternal deaths and wrongful imprisonment. International human rights concern.
Get weekly policy updates and new issue alerts delivered to your inbox.
Gun policy in the United States involves balancing Second Amendment rights with public safety concerns. The debate encompasses federal and state regulations, licensing requirements, and restrictions on specific firearm types and accessories.
The balance of power between the federal government and individual states is one of America's oldest and most enduring constitutional debates. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not delegated to the federal government, yet the precise boundary has been contested since the founding. Today, this tension manifests in conflicts over immigration enforcement, sanctuary policies, federal funding conditions, gun regulations, abortion access, marijuana legalization, and environmental standards. The January 2026 standoff in Minnesota—where the state challenged ICE operations, the Governor placed the National Guard on standby, and the federal government threatened to withhold billions in Medicaid funds—represents the most acute federal-state conflict in decades, raising questions about the limits of federal authority and states' ability to resist federal policy.